Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 3:05 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
,United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
This case, which will be argued on Monday, marks the third time since 2018 that the court has tangled with the stop-time rule, with previous rendezvous in Pereira v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:33 pm
Part V then considers the way Western secular states have facilitated this new role for religion in places like Afghanistan. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
Ben Challis, writing on the 1709 Blog, reports a not entirely unsurprising but nonetheless significant ruling from the United States that a download is not a performance for the purposes of copyright law. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:01 am
United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-running Exxon-Valdez case, Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Magistrate Judge Mark R. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:15 am
“[V]isitors to [defendant’s] Internet homepage were able to click a link [to purchase defendant’s product] . . . and then select ‘United States’ and ‘Delaware’ from separate drop-down menus. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
United States of America v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:30 am
In a recent article, Michael Solimine argues that the Office of the Solicitor General should limit its involvement to cases in which the interests of the United States are directly affected, as opposed to cases concerning the “broader policy agenda” of the administration. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:25 am
§ 1052. [3] Gilson LaLonde, Far from Fluent, supra note 1 at 789. [4] Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am
At Opinio Juris, William Dodge discusses Cardona v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
United States Postal Service (unreported, 2005 FC 1630) decision which addressed the “public authority” issue. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:22 am
However … [it] has not used the mark in any meaningful way anywhere… [and] the record is devoid of evidence that would create a genuine issue of material fact that [it] uses the mark CASINO DE MONACO to identify its services, anywhere, but particularly in the United States. [read post]
