Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 4,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
What possible practical guidance do we get by some Delphic pronouncement from Kennedy that some but not all of the Second Amendment applies against the states? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
That is all that matters. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
It matters because in modern society the state has very extensive powers of keeping records on its citizens. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 11:17 pm
It was the interpretation that mattered, no the results. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:14 am
 Makar would only concede that "I think it [age] does matter. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
In this regard, the record demonstrates that Goodman’s conduct in the instant case did not rise to the level of malpractice as a matter of law (cf. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:53 pm
The Fifth Circuit found that a DI test claim was cognizable under the FHA, but remanded the matter to the trial court on the issue of relief. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:08 am
Ming, Kennedy and Hughes could whip up quite a yellow rage about this one, and many more to come… I look forward to our lunch in the partners dining room at 1300 hours. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:07 am
Whether he actually said "biggest damned fool mistake I ever made" or not, that's pretty much how he regarded the matter. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:38 pm
Instead, it held, "[w]hat matters is the objective reach of the claim. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the Court’s opinion, which Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all joined. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:40 am
It doesn't matter much what she actually did -- what matters here is that she did not make an enemy. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
(As a practical matter, today’s decision will matter mostly for Medicare-tax purposes, because railroad employees with generous stock-option packages will probably hit the Tier 1 and Tier 2 wage caps based on their cash compensation alone.) [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm
And, while Justice Kennedy did sign onto that opinion, he later affirmed in both Comstock and Bond his view that the Commerce Clause does have justiciable limits.)The right to be freefrom federal regulation is not absolute, and yields to theimperative that Congress be free to forge national solutions tonational problems, no matter how local–or seeminglypassive–their individual origins.In short, Judge Silberman’s opinion decision ultimately rests on… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm
On those other days, it can feel as if all that really matters is if the idea is expressed, or re-expressed, by an elite scholar at a school that “matters” among academics. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
If (as seems very possible) eight justices have already made up their minds, all that really matters may be what Gorsuch thinks. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:51 pm
It is not simply a matter of removing people’s rights for bringing digital defamation cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
Although Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote a concurrence, clearly offered no quarter to those prior statements, the proclamation was itself facially neutral and bona fide, and that ended the matter. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:04 am
It doesn't matter if they get it right. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:04 am
Flores, an opinion authored by Justice Kennedy. [read post]
