Search for: "PEOPLE v. BROWN"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
Brown was argued before the Fourth Circuit en banc. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am
“[T]he general rule is that testimony of a witness’ opinion is not admissible into evidence” People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 8:27 pm
Brown, which is now before the Court and which has been relisted for Friday February 21. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
Brown (1999); and held similarly where there was a common hallway that required a separate key to enter the building in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
With its decision in Sackett v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
Brown (1999); and held similarly where there was a common hallway that required a separate key to enter the building in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:08 pm
Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
When the pressure is enough, however, the Court can often find a way, as Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
And then there is Professor Raoul Burger’s version in his book, “Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment,” in which Burger argued that Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
It’s especially galling that the court cloaked an attack on integration in the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment and the Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
SO, HERE’S THE BOTTOM-LINE… In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
