Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 2881 - 2900 of 12,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2009, 5:36 am by SHG
In a decision that, from start to finish, reflects the most thoughtful and incisive review of the impropriety of police use of Tasers whenever it's convenient, the 9th Circuit in Bryan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
This was found to increase juror engagement and reduce instances of people ‘zoning out’. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
This was found to increase juror engagement and reduce instances of people ‘zoning out’. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:27 am by Matrix Law
It must therefore be assumed that people of modest means are not excluded from benefitting from Nuffield Health’s activities overall, even if they are excluded from the facilities at Merton Abbey gym. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
The trial court determined [Leak’s] prior record level to be II, imposed a suspended sentenceof nine to twenty months imprisonment, and placed [Leak] on supervised probation for twelve months.State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) Last in our series of updates is Boolen v Barking & Dagenham. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Does consideration of the consumer simply help explain trademark law at some general level? [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
” On the other side of that coin, people feel quite comfortable saying terrible things if they are not worried about being judged harshly.One particularly awful example of this phenomenon is the Supreme Court’s infamous 1986 Bowers v. [read post]