Search for: "People v. Bounds"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 10:47 pm
Some of them take people on board who I'm pretty sure have been convicted of things. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
It is no secret that people can do reckless and stupid things when they are drunk. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:46 pm
See also People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Michael Chambers, Bound by No Law, No Soul, No Anything at All: Bridging Constructions of Corporate Personhood by Reformers Past and Present. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Appellants appeal from a judgment based on, inter alia, a determination that they were judicially estopped from denying that they are bound by a settlement agreement. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Appellants appeal from a judgment based on, inter alia, a determination that they were judicially estopped from denying that they are bound by a settlement agreement. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Held: the newspaper’s defence of fair comment was bound to succeed. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:20 am
In other words, Ireland will be bound internationally by the judgment tomorrow. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column and my post on Monday, I took issue with the framing of the relevance of Romer v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center (NWC) received a letter from whistleblowers concerning our position on the Senate version of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (S. 372). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:29 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Judgment was entered for the defendant on the grounds that her defence of “fair comment” (as it now not known) was “bound to succeed”. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:23 am
No power delegated is "plenary" within its "sphere", despite the opinion of Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
None of the sexy stuff that people routinely associate with criminal law. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:01 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
It's bound to happen if you kill enough people. [read post]
