Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2881 - 2900 of 178,376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2009, 6:22 am
That’s the question asked in an article in today’s WSJ by Nathan Koppel, who shines a light on the phenomenon of certain shareholders turning up time and time again as lead plaintiffs in lawsuits filed against companies. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 4:16 pm
Here, the court finds that defendants have established as a matter of law that there is no causal connection between the neurological and behavioral injuries alleged in plaintiff's bill of particulars and the infant plaintiff's accident. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 4:12 am by Andrew Frisch
As relevant to this discussion, the court recited the following facts (following a period of employment where the plaintiff was solely defendant’s employee): As support for the contention Plaintiff was not their employee, Defendants point to evidence in the record, primarily from Plaintiffs deposition testimony, establishing the following. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:50 am by Matt C. Bailey
  While the Court's preliminary conclusions regarding predominance are likely not binding, a plaintiff confronted by such a scenario may have more efficient methods to resolve this issue – such as dismissing the plaintiff's individual FLSA claim. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
  The basis for the Plaintiff's lawsuit was that the Defendant doctor had prescribed opioids to the Plaintiff in excessive amounts for years which allegedly caused the Plaintiff to become addicted and require rehab treatment.In a fashion reminiscent of Judge R. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
The basis of the Court’s conclusion that the plaintiffs lack standing to assert Section 10(b) claims is the “purchaser-seller” rule, first developed by the Second Circuit in the early 50’s, which limits the class of plaintiffs to “actual purchasers or sellers of securities. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:21 am by Levin Papantonio
"Today's settlement announcement marks an unbelievable result for plaintiffs and victims," Rafferty said, "but this isn't over. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 12:09 am by emagraken
s ability to corroborate the plaintiffs evidence was limited by the fact that the plaintiff has not lived at home for extended periods of time since the accident, and is currently not living at home. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:18 pm by Kevin
       Related StoriesPlaintiff Complains Pop-Tarts Less Healthy Than She ExpectedConsumer Alleged She Wanted Only Water From One Particular Mountain (Which May Not Exist)Plaintiff Alleges “Heart of the Himalayas” Is in India, Not Pakistan (It's in Nepal)  [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 2:09 pm
" I say it's for plaintiffs' lawyers, but won't defense lawyers benefit too? [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:44 pm
Baby needs surgery immediately to avoid permanent disfigurement due to doctor’s negligence. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
The fact that a plaintiff in the same situation as the Concepcions might choose not to make a claim for such a small overcharge is not the Court's concern, even if a class-action lawyer might be eager to bring the case on behalf of all similarly situated plaintiffs, but for the class-action waiver. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:35 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
 Here, the hot air balloon company did not have a legal duty to protect the plaintiff from crash landings caused by the pilot’s failure to manage the balloon’s descent. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:13 am by Joseph Gribbin
Judge Robinson noted that, because Defendants "will be deemed to have knowledge of [Plaintiff's] patent as of the date the complaint was filed," and because "the only consequence (I believe) of this decision is limiting plaintiff's damages to the period dating from a defendant's first knowledge of [Plaintiff's] patent, the court will so limit plaintiff's damages as to each… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Defendant's first argument, that plaintiff failed to identify the instrumentality accused of infringement, was disregarded by the district court. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:42 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
  She was awarded a judgment in the amount of $250,000, to be secured by a mortgage on the defendant’s property, which the plaintiff recorded in August of 2014. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:02 am
("HTC") filed a motion seeking to recover attorney fees and costs from plaintiff's attorneys as well as from plaintiff Intellect Wireless, Inc. [read post]