Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 55,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2007, 4:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 6:28 am
Here ist he abstract:Today, courts and commentators generally agree that early efforts to strictly limit the federal government to only expressly enumerated powers were decisively rebuffed by Chief Justice John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 5:55 am
Two decades earlier, in a case called Buck v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 8:53 am
Additional Resources: Etherton v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505), also on April 23, and Engquist v . [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am
If post-ratification history is relevant to constitutional meaning, the “Decision of 1789” presents more challenge than support for the unitary theory, with implications for Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
A better approach would be to future-proof the privacy-intrusion balance.26 May 2016: The content v metadata contest at the heart of the Investigatory Powers Bill. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
A better approach would be to future-proof the privacy-intrusion balance.26 May 2016: The content v metadata contest at the heart of the Investigatory Powers Bill. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:39 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:34 am
It is a myth that Chief Justice John Marshall invented, created or established the power of judicial review in his 1803 opinion in the case of Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
KG v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:05 am
In Kirschner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 8:45 am
In any event, a whole life term was not an irreducible sentence since the Home Secretary could always use his statutory power to release a prisoner whose continued imprisonment would amount to inhuman or degrading treatment. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:20 am
The appellant landlord appealed to the Supreme Court contending that the power to impose conditions under the Housing Act 2004, ss 64 and 67 (licensing a house in multiple occupation) could not be used to limit the class of persons for whom a HMO was suitable, and that the conditions imposed by the FTT, UT and the Court of Appeal (that communal space be kept available for communal living only and that no bedrooms be let to persons other than full-time students) were irrational and… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Jackson suggested that the Court has a special responsibility to ward off abuses of emergency power in a neglected part of another famous case, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:46 am
v=7Fa1cBOhW60&list=PLD58397F3009D2FB7 [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
Myers v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:57 pm
The Supreme Court judgment in Kelo v City of New London sparked a political outcry which led to severe limitations being placed on the power of state authorities to compulsorily acquire property for private redevelopment. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:33 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
