Search for: "Soling v. New York State"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
The NFLPA decertified as a union soon after (in order to avoid the antitrust exemptions of the labor laws) and certain players, most prominently, New York Jet Freeman McNeil, filed an antitrust suit against the NFL's free agency rules. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900, affirmed 49 NY2d 747.NB: Section 30.1(e) also sets out proceeds for the reinstatement of a public officer, other than to a public office to which he or she had been elected, if the conviction was the sole basis for the position being declared vacant and such conviction is overturned on appeal.* A plea in a criminal case by which the defendant answers the charges made in… [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
Although the 1961 Southern District of New York case Molinas v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
And, so far, no official has suggested whether those California marriages might still be "valid or recognized" in other states that recognize same-sex marriages, such as Massachusetts, New York, or Connecticut, taking literally the text of the amendment in applying its effect solely to California. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:52 pm
The Arizona action was consolidated with the New York action and Playshare’s declaratory judgment causes of actions were treated as counterclaims.Both sides filed cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 9:38 am
Here is the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:29 pm
Though the statutory law in custody in New York is somewhat sparse, the Domestic Relations Law 70 provides that there will be no prima facie right to custody for either parent – rather the court must determine solely what is in the best interests of the child. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:08 pm
Mass. 1975) (3-judge court), and the one decision cited in that case, State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 10:52 am
"] From today's Second Circuit decision in Palin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:14 am
And it is a breach of those fiduciary duties where the majority exercises even legitimate rights, “if the sole purpose is reduction of the number of profit-sharers, or ultimately ‘to increase the individual wealth of the remaining shareholders’” (Alpert v 28 Williams St. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 2:17 am
Crotty Saland PC is a New York criminal defense firm. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:31 pm
During the 2017 legislative session, bills dealing with biometric notice and consent regimes similar to BIPA were introduced in several states, including Alaska (H.B. 72), Arizona, Connecticut (H.B. 5522), Massachusetts (H.B. 1985 ), Montana (H.B. 518), Missouri, New Hampshire (H.B. 523) and New York – but all failed to pass. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:31 pm
During the 2017 legislative session, bills dealing with biometric notice and consent regimes similar to BIPA were introduced in several states, including Alaska (H.B. 72), Arizona, Connecticut (H.B. 5522), Massachusetts (H.B. 1985 ), Montana (H.B. 518), Missouri, New Hampshire (H.B. 523) and New York – but all failed to pass. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:40 pm
That presumption can be rebutted, however, as was the case in a recent New York decision, Matter of Ruper v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:11 am
., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
The Grand Chamber’s ruling is expected to set a (new?) [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Such pleas echo the sentiment of Eric Garner’s family following their $5.9 million settlement with the City of New York, when they stated, “Justice is when somebody is held accountable for what they do. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. [read post]
