Search for: "State v House" Results 2881 - 2900 of 28,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2006, 5:12 am
Davies, (Not Yet) Taking Rights Seriously: The House of Lords in Begum v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Loan workout programs and foreclosure moratoriums have failed to reverse the decline in the housing market. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:13 am
Today the United Kingdom's Court of Appeal (Civil Division) released its judgment in AS & DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which concerned the lawfulness of the deportation of the applicant to Libya, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with the proposed receiving state. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:18 am by John Bursch
Federal Election Commission, the case that could overturn the landmark Austin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm by Brian Crossman
The appellate court decision was significant in holding that Los Angeles was preempted, by a provision of the state's Costa-Hawkins Act, from enforcing its inclusionary housing ordinance against a development of rental apartments, The state provision in question, Civil Code, Section 1954.53(a), authorizes landlords to "establish the initial rental rate for a dwelling or unit. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:26 pm by Robert Kreisman
Although a trust instrument stated the house was part of the trust, there was no separate, formal documentation showing that a transfer of the house had been placed in the trust. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:56 am
It might be an interesting show: Digital Future of the United States: Part V: The Future of Video [via 463] Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet Hearing 9:30 a.m. in room 2123 Rayburn House Office Building Witness List Connect to the Live Video Webcast 100 kbps Later: 463 has busily been preparing and posting links to chunks of the hearing - see the May 10 and May 11 postings (consolidated as part of the Online Video Policy section). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:50 am by Brian A. Comer
I have been hearing for awhile that there is a chance that the South Carolina State Legislature may take action in response to the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Branham v. [read post]