Search for: "State v Locke"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) New Practice Note PAN 01/09 on trade mark registrations for ‘shopping centre services’ (Class 46) (IPKat) United States US General Seattle’s Gary Locke may become new Commerce Secretary (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Inventive Step) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Hal Wegner) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) calls for… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
I mean, you're --but what about the -the --the combination to the lock on the safe? [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
Moreover, contrary to its claims, Apple has repeatedly increased prices after developers and consumers were locked in, including by requiring use of Apple’s IAP to process payments for in-app digital content (2009); requiring IAP for subscriptions (2011); and charging developers for search ads (2016). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
It would be hard to find a business dissolution case with messier facts and thornier legal issues than Tal v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
Budai v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
Budai v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Ezendam B.V. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Thanks to Eugene for inviting me to blog about the historical arguments made by the State of New York and its supporting amici in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
Subsequent to our decision, Respondents filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the United States Supreme Court decided Cavazos v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
Although the legal premise for such cases arose in the 1980s (see, for example State (O’Connell) v Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362 and Murphy v DPP [1989] I.L.R.M. 71) real interest in the “missing evidence” concept as a method to seek to force the prohibition of an impending trial did not gather pace until the early 2000s. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:34 pm
v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
The petition said the rulings incorrectly applied the Court's 2004 decision in Locke v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In 2008 in K.U. v. [read post]
