Search for: "State v. Church" Results 2881 - 2900 of 5,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2016, 10:07 am by Skier & Associates
The Alabama State Board of Health created a controlled substance list with 5 different sections in it (called schedules I, II, III, IV, and V) and if you are caught with one of the substances on the list you can be charged. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:07 am by Skier & Associates
The Alabama State Board of Health created a controlled substance list with 5 different sections in it (called schedules I, II, III, IV, and V) and if you are caught with one of the substances on the list you can be charged. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:07 am by Skier & Associates
The Alabama State Board of Health created a controlled substance list with 5 different sections in it (called schedules I, II, III, IV, and V) and if you are caught with one of the substances on the list you can be charged. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 4:57 am by Frank Cranmer
One might have thought that, given the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Bayatyan v Armenia [2011] ECHR 1095, states parties would have got the message by now. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
McBeth, Much Ado About Nothing Much: Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Virginia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm by John Elwood
Restrictions on tax exemption Wisconsin law exempts from its state unemployment tax system certain religious organizations that are “operated, supervised, controlled, or principally supported by a church or convention or association of churches” and that are also “operated primarily for religious purposes. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, as Education Week, Appellate Daily, and Courthouse News Service report, the Court granted certiorari in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost observes that although “[t]he atheists and nonbelievers who brought this lawsuit seven years ago were fated to lose once it reached a Supreme Court that has been increasingly uninterested in policing the separation of church and state,” “they might have expected more respectful treatment in oral arguments. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
They first will contend that the Texas Supreme Court should follow its 1909 holding in Brown v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This Sunday profile of Judge Lackey in the Sun-Herald notes that he's "a deacon at First Baptist Church and a member of a state commission charged with ensuring judicial integrity," which as several commentators note might indicate that he was a risky one to approach with a proposal for corruption. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm by Elie Mystal
Later, his followers, “the Raelians,” set up an advocacy group to expose pedophilia in the Roman Catholic Church. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
And in Luna Torres v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Therefore, we reverse Young's conviction.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  In another case involving church-state issues, the Court declined to sort out how far local governments must go, under the federal Religious Land Use Act, to allow churches to build new structures in areas of the city not zoned for such uses (San Leandro v. [read post]