Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2881 - 2900 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2021, 10:08 am by Eric Goldman
The court flatly states: “a plaintiff should not be barred from proving presale, initial-interest confusion. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:47 pm
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey agreed with Gilead and, pursuant to a stipulation, granted it final judgment on infringement. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:18 am
Accordingly, while the district court recognized that “coastal erosion is a serious problem in south Louisiana,” id., at 695, it granted the defense motion to dismiss the class action complaint for failure to state a claim.Download PDF file of Barasich v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Judge Boyle rejected the three-readings rule argument, noting the First District Appellate Court recently reiterated the Supreme Court’s holding that the enrolled bill doctrine precludes judicial review of statutes on the basis that the legislature failed to adhere to procedural requirements, citing Doe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state.  [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
Key Points from the District Court of Delaware Summary Judgment Decision – The court followed 9th Circuit precedent in hiQ Labs that says that accessing public data cannot constitute a CFAA violation. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Khan seeks to litigate Doe's sexual assault accusations for a third time, suing Doe in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut … for defamation and tortious interference with contract, claims on which he would bear a preponderance burden at any trial. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
  First, he argued that the Second Circuit’s decision conflicted with the Court’s decision in First National Bank in St. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:47 am
You’ll remember that after the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:44 am by Mayela Celis
  Please note that US courts often use the terms “ameliorative measures” and “undertakings” interchangeably (as stated in the petition).This petition has been docketed as Golan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Allowing DCOP to withhold its CEQA arguments from its administrative appeal and assert them in court for the first time under these circumstances would appear antithetical to the purposes of the jurisdictional exhaustion requirement, which include lightening the burden of overworked courts while developing a complete administrative record promoting judicial efficiency and facilitating judicial review. [read post]