Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 16,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Here, much to our liking, the court cited the recent Tenth Circuit ruling in Caplinger v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:48 am
The Washington State Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and parts of McConnell v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:50 am
In an ACLU case currently pending before the Supreme Court, Arizona v. the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, ACLU clients are challenging the State of Arizona's attempt to impose additional barriers to voter registration beyond the requirements of the standardized federal voter registration form. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm
Finally, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:50 am
The Supreme Court may have thought that it dodged deciding the issue of state gay marriage bans when it avoided the merits of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:20 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:02 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 1:25 am
[United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm
More specifically, California state courts as well as federal courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded (in light of Luther v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:51 am
But the sheer mass of history makes it hard for the Justices to identify legitimate legal change in Indian law. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:48 am
Although the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 7:09 am
We can only hope that this will be the result of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:08 am
RPX Corp. v. [read post]
