Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 7,197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 5:29 am
ZTE guidance after the Federal Court of Justice of Germany vitiated the ECJ case law in two Sisvel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:50 am
McKenney v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:25 am
Holder case, which was granted by the court, challenging part of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:13 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:15 pm
Holder which courts use to decide whether to grant a stay pending appeal in a case. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
Do Denim v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:07 pm
Department of Justice & Ex Officio Member United States Sentencing Commission Program Description On August 12, 2013, Attorney General Holder released a memorandum entitled “Department Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Drug Cases. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:26 am
The outcome of Huawei v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
Next, [he] would request an actual payoff figure from the true mortgage holder. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
" Holder's memo is a welcome about face from the state of affairs announced in John Ashcroft's October 12, 2001, FOIA memo issued weeks after the September 11 tragedy. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
State Farm Insurance v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court warned in McCreary County v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:14 am
Holder in 2013, which limited the application of another portion of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
Illinois Brick could have been overruled in Apple v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United States (09-6338) — authority of federal judges, in setting a new prison sentence, to go below Guideline range Barber v. [read post]
