Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 5,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm
United States, further paring back applicability of the exclusionary rule, while Sotomayor penned J.B.D. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
Justice Sotomayor highlighted the 1994 Supreme Court opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:39 am
United States, No. 17-5716. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:37 pm
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:18 am
United States (09-6822) – In a 6-2 opinion by Justice Sotomayor (with Justice Kagan recused), the Court vacates in part, affirms in part, and remands the case to the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Justice Breyer dissents in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
In a decision issued this morning in Williamson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:03 am
Sotomayor joined Gorsuch’s dissent from the denial of review in Stuart v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:02 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
The pun seems inevitable: In Wednesday morning’s oral argument in Class v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:39 am
While the justices pressed both sides, there was one sticking point for the government that many justices kept returning to: United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
In Locke v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
Even though the standards of the law are borrowed largely from similar laws related to the distribution of sexually themed materials to minors (see Ginsberg v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 7:09 am
Here's the full text of the new case, Ramos v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
In June Medical v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan endorsed this approach, noting that, in the 1991 decision California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm
Much of Monday’s oral argument in Brownback v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
It has been to the Supreme Court before in the form of Armstrong v. [read post]
