Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 15,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 4:45 am
Wells v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:32 am
" Ortiz v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Horton v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
On the state level, formal constitutional change is persistent and ongoing. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:48 am
The appeals court also remanded for a new trial on their disparate treatment claim, finding that the district court provided an erroneous jury instruction (Ernst v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:03 pm
" The consent form also stated that subjects could be withdrawn from the study if the investigators deemed that the risk to them outweighed the benefits, if they were noncompliant with instructions, or "if the agency funding the study decides to stop the study early for a variety of reasons. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:40 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:46 pm
The second began in 2005, when the Supreme Court overturned the de novo standard on constitutional grounds in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:44 am
Unlike the plaintiffs in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Vera and Shaw v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 8:47 am
Samadpour, M., V. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:04 am
Facts: This case (Graham et al v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 7:15 am
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am
This case, called Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:39 am
Concepcion, and Smith v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:55 am
Resolving Juror Confusion New York’s Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
