Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*" Results 2881 - 2900 of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 8:00 am by lawshucks
Among the career highlights noted is his work on Law Shucks favorite, the recent Airgas proxy fight (or as we like to call it, Wachtell v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:59 am
  And, six months ago,  Judge Sotomayor wrote a notable separate opinion in US v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:00 pm
  She will participate in her first oral argument next month, when the Court rehears the campaign finance case Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
US Supreme Court Rules in Securities Fraud Statute of Limitations Case As noted in the D&O Diary Blog, earlier this week, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Merck v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Sullivan [Will Baude, Cass Sunstein, Ramesh Ponnuru] “A new documentary showcased by PBS presents Montana as a success story of campaign finance reform and Wisconsin’s John Doe investigations as a failure. [read post]
11 May 2012, 12:00 pm by Bexis
  His new email will be jmbeck@reedsmith.com.We like amicability because nobody (except the other side of the “v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:54 am by Shawn Nevers
Sullivan for punishing speech regarding government officials. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
The case, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:34 am by Antitrust Today
A day before Judge Brody’s ruling, the Third Circuit vacated a $295 million settlement in the De Beers case, Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 pm by cdw
  As Adam Liptak notes “Sullivan & Cromwell, had agreed to represent Cory R. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:45 am
” As I’ve written many times (see, e.g., Onshore v Offshore Pivot Point - Part II (9/13/06)), this is an empirical question. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 10:48 am
The Eighth Circuit case, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:56 am
  On June 11, 2009, the Appellate Division decided Michael Kappre v. [read post]