Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 2881 - 2900 of 11,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 12:03 pm by Associated Press
The Federal Communications Commission could dump rules that keep internet providers from favoring some services over others, but couldn't bar states like California from enacting their own prohibitions, a federal court ruled. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The court rejected a key part of the FCC's order that would have preempted conflicting state and local regulations. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:48 am by Michael Rushford
  Courts Divided on Prosecuting Violent Juveniles as Adults:  The validity of SB 1391, A California law which bars the prosecution of violent juveniles in adult court, will likely be determined by the state supreme court. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:09 am by Jon Brodkin
"First, the Court concludes that the Commission has not shown legal authority to issue its Preemption Directive, which would have barred states from imposing any rule or requirement that the Commission 'repealed or decided to refrain from imposing' in the Order or that is 'more stringent' than the Order. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 6:26 am by Nassiri Law
But she’s back in court facing them again, this time for a clause in the settlement that required her to resign – and barred her from ever working for the agency again. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, it's not even barred by the relevant Tennessee statute (Tenn. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
DNC Raises Threshold to Make November Debate Stage Politico – Zach Montellaro | Published: 9/23/2019 The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has slightly raised the bar to qualify for the November primary debate. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato merits brief in Supreme Court case of Espinosa v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am by Eric Goldman
” The court explains: “It is not misleading, for example, for Defendants to state on their website that they are about twenty miles away from Long Beach. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
“Small claims court for copyright” idea, now moving rapidly through Congress, could create a new business model for troll claimants [Mike Masnick, TechDirt; EFF on CASE Act] “If Boston is weirdly NOT full of good restaurant/bar/cafes for its size, and if people don’t want to stay after they hit 26 or so, these throttled [liquor] licenses are one of the real structural reasons why. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The most analogous limitation period was the four-year statute of limitations under California law. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
 On this specific point, the court first recalled that the California courts have set a high bar for repugnancy and underlined that, according to the Ohno’s decision, which dealt with Japanese tort law, repugnancy does not mean that the foreign judgment is contrary to the U.S. public policy, but rather that it is so offensive to the public policy to be prejudicial to recognized standards of morality and to the general interests of the citizens. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 12:25 pm by Sheppard Mullin
California’s Recognition Act, like the analogous statutes in most U.S. states, provides that a local court is not required to recognize a foreign judgment that is repugnant to the public policy of the state or the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 12:25 pm by Sheppard Mullin
California’s Recognition Act, like the analogous statutes in most U.S. states, provides that a local court is not required to recognize a foreign judgment that is repugnant to the public policy of the state or the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 12:25 pm by Sheppard Mullin
California’s Recognition Act, like the analogous statutes in most U.S. states, provides that a local court is not required to recognize a foreign judgment that is repugnant to the public policy of the state or the United States. [read post]