Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 2881 - 2900 of 8,925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States Postal Service 17-1594 Issues: (1) Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; and (2) whether an action under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm by Karen Tani
When the Virginia General Assembly retaliated with laws designed to disbar the two lawyers and discredit the NAACP, they defiantly carried the fight to the United States Supreme Court and won. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:00 pm by FM Librarian
Regimes of Justification in and around R v Appulonappa," Canadian Journal of Law and Society = Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, vol. 33, no. 1 (April 2018)"'In the Sport I Am Here': Therapeutic Processes and Health Effects of Sport and Exercise on PTSD," Qualitative Health Research, vol. 28, no. 3 (2018)"Infectious Disease Profiles of Syrian and Eritrean Migrants Presenting in Europe: A Systematic Review," Travel Medicine and… [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Defendants argued that blocking is not state action because it simply utilizes functionality made available to every Twitter user. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
  See AIA Section 18 (because they it is a temporary program, the CBM provisions have not been codified in the United States Code). [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
McGraw Hill et al, was then heard on Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that Monday’s decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:55 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
But what the courts seem to overlook is that Article III is one of several articles to the Constitution of the United States which begins: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United… [read post]
24 May 2018, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs themselves recognize this fact in the section of their complaint entitled "Sexual Harassment and the #metoo Movement in America": "beginning in approximately October 2017, sexual harassment in the workplace became a major topic of conversation throughout the United States. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am by Matthew Kahn
United States, to find the Supreme Court explicitly saying that the Fourth Amendment embraced a right to privacy and that the surveillance of a phone call was a "search" within that amendment. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion by Judge Neil Gorsuch in Epic Systems v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Trump, '45th President of the United States of America, Washington, D.C.'"; (2) "that the President's tweets from @realDonaldTrump ... are official records that must be preserved under the Presidential Records Act"; and (3) that the @realDonaldTrump account has been used in the course of the appointment of officers (including cabinet secretaries), the removal of officers, and the conduct of foreign policy -- all of which are squarely executive… [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:37 am
If convicted, each Defendant faces  a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense.United States of America v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am by Andrew Hamm
He used to tell the “story of how meaningful it was for him to go up to the podium and say, ‘I’m Thurgood Marshall and I’m representing the United States of America. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:30 am by Dan Carvajal
Introduction Personal saving, the setting aside of resources today to get benefits in the future, is taxed in a variety of ways in the United States. [read post]