Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 7,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 2:00 am
” ZT filed a trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, but the application was refused registration based on Inditex’s prior registrations for ZARA. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
Technical trademark use is the type of use required to file a federal trademark application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
Technical trademark use is the type of use required to file a federal trademark application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced that as part of its effort to solicit input from the public regarding the legal contours of patent subject matter eligibility, it will be holding two roundtables, one in November and one in December. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:15 am
In April 2016, The United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) issued a precedential decision canceling the trademark registration of a subsidiary because the parent company was the only one using the mark... [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:54 pm
You can read this while waiting in line.USPTO registered, cancelled, and re-registered the CRONUT markThe United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) first issued a registration for the CRONUT mark in January 2014 to Ansel’s International Pastry Concepts LLC for, among other items, “Bakery goods, namely, croissant and doughnut hybrid. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff Following the United States Supreme Court's ruling in the Alice Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:28 am
Their names frequently mimic the PTO’s, and include words like “United States,” “U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
Last December, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the Lanham Act’s disparagement provision unconstitutional, stating that while the rejected trademarks “convey hurtful speech that harms members of oft-stigmatized communities,” the First Amendment “protects even hurtful speech. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:00 am
As the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently noted in Bruce Munro and Bruce Munro Studio v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:30 am
The Slants have contested the federal ban’s constitutionality ever since the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) denied the band name trademark registration based on a conclusion that the proposed mark was offensive to Asian-Americans. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:30 am
The Slants have contested the federal ban’s constitutionality ever since the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) denied the band name trademark registration based on a conclusion that the proposed mark was offensive to Asian-Americans. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s cancellation of the team’s trademarks. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:27 am
Clarke (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html We feature articles about the recent White House Tribal Leaders Conference as well as a settlement of mismanaged monetary assets and natural resources held in trust by the United States for the benefit of tribes. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office denied the Slants’ trademark registration under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, barring disparaging trademark registrations. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:15 am
Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to set or adjust certain patent fees, as authorized by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 8:31 am
Long-time readers know that that’s the law which allows the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to refuse to issue federal registrations to offensive trademarks, i.e., marks that “may disparage … persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute. [read post]
