Search for: "United States v. Dollar"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 4,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
The enforceability of non-competes in the United States is almost entirely a matter of state law, and in Connecticut, that largely means common law. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
United States, 546 F.3d 450 (2008), acknowledged that their holdings were at odds with the decisions of seven other circuits, including the Second in Campusano. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
He had not, however, seen patients since 2001 and was no longer licensed to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
He had not, however, seen patients since 2001 and was no longer licensed to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:52 am
This will be the case in respect of Google, Apple and Microsoft, which are all based in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:57 am
That United States District Court order, however, was vacated by a later order which directly contradicts Taylor's arguments on appeal. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
United States); McDonald, the Chicago gun rights case; and a couple of big First Amendment cases. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
United States Fish & Wildlife – 5/26/15. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 2:09 pm
We assume that the plaintiff/relator in United States ex rel Gerasimos Petratos v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
And the dollar, particularly in the United States, has market power. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 1:13 am
No amendment of the Bill of Rights can be sacrificed lest the entire Constitution implode.)The 10th amendment recognizes that "powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution ... are reserved to the States ... or to the people. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
Walmsley, Best Mode: A Plea to Repair or Sacrifice This Broken Requirement of United States Patent Law, 9 Mich. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
Conservative social movement activity explains the sluggish move to integrate public schools after the landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
103 (2017), University of Chicago Law School, citing Hans v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:27 am
Supreme Court cases, Moe v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am
Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act is proof that compromise is still possible in the halls of the United States Congress and that Washington can still work for manufacturers and citizens across the country. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
After Google's recent--and expected (this blog was first to report that it was coming)--petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari (i.e., for a review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Oracle's favor, see my refresher Q&A after the appellate decision), I have seen a couple of articles that described the state of affairs and quoted observers on what all of this meant. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm
United States of America. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
[19] For example, as the name suggests, the R&D Tax Credit was added to encourage research and development in the United States and as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction was added to encourage increasing the quality of manufacturing and jobs in the United States. [read post]
