Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
First, the administration contends that the United States is in a state of armed conflict with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
Judge Susan Illston stated this was not a problem because the court could "group[] similar state laws together and apply[] them as a unit. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:13 pm
& Loan Assn. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Chicago, the first employment law case of this term, and Holder v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondents, Fed. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Otherwise, the royalty base must be limited to the “smallest saleable unit. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:31 am
Holder, the plaintiff, a subdivision of Austin, Texas, sued the United States, arguing that Section 5 exceeds the scope of Congress's authority to enforce the 15th Amendment. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:57 am
Dawes, (we filed an amicus brief), and United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:36 pm
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, ELECTIONS Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:36 pm
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, ELECTIONS Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
United States 12-1185Issue: Whether, in light of the plain meaning of “threat” and the constitutional rule of Virginia v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in opposition for respondent Jeppesen… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:35 pm
In a case decided in 1942, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
Kaersvang: Marbury v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellee. 4th District. [read post]
