Search for: "United States v. Was"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 102,811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am
Q v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:46 am
Harvey was a citizen of Scotland and Means was a United States citizen, born and raised in Washington state. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
Recall that in 2018, in Pereira v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:21 am
"... and that achieving that diversity requires limited consideration of race in selecting those who join the Army as cadets at the United States Military Academy at West Point.... [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:46 am
Constitution (Article I, Section 2, Clause 3; Article I, Section 8; The Fourteenth Amendment), treaties, and laws, authorize Native American tribes to govern themselves as sovereign nations within the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:03 am
She wrote: For more than forty years, our Nation’s military leaders have determined that a diverse Army officer corps is a national-security imperative and that achieving that diversity requires limited consideration of race in selecting those who join the Army as cadets at the United States Military Academy at West Point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
The business judgment rule is a critical feature of the law governing corporations throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
Facts: This case (Waters v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:33 am
There is currently a case being considered by the SJC, Freiner v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
