Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2022, 6:36 am
Problem is that you don't get qualified immunity if the jury resolves the evidence in a way that shows the officer did not act reasonably. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 3:06 am
(See Don Cruse's in-depth analysis on the Supreme Court of Texas Blog.) [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:04 am
It's not that I don't care or wish there was a way in which people whose senses aren't working as they should could enjoy all that life offers. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
We don't have the right to risk our clients on the altar of our personal beliefs. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm
This one didn't. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:47 am
So I know we don't have a copy here.THE COURT: Okay. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 8:00 am
But when I don't have something to say, I don't beat myself up over it. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
They simply canvass big business for the places they would least likely to get sued, or cherry-pick some decisions that they don't like.There is some whining about "trial lawyer money" influencing judges, but no indication as to how much money was spent by the Fortune 500.I briefly noted last year's report, quoting the Center for Justice and Democracy when they called the report "dishonest. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:59 am
Why don't we just give em all 50 years in jail. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:42 am
I don't know whether that day will ever come. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:11 am
If we don't affirmatively restrict the relief judges order in ex parte proceedings and teach judges to remember the potential abuses of the ex parte system, we are going to see more junky outcomes like this. [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:05 am
I don't believe the FTC would win a preliminary injunction. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:29 pm
And while we don't know the percentages, we know that in general they're close enough for the system to survive the mistakes. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
[DCist] * Adventures in Lawyer Advertising: "Don't pee on me! [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:35 pm
A good sub heading for this case would be 'if at first you don't suceed, try, try and try again, and still fail'! [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm
It's not that we don't embarrass easily, but that we don't embarrass. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:16 am
Don't save for them, but should appeal be the only avenue remaining, don't despair either. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
But whatever you do, don't sit on this situation. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 12:59 pm
At the end of the day, I don't think that is a very appealing position. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:33 pm
My criticism of the defendants' position isn't limited to procedural matters, though. [read post]
