Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 2881 - 2900 of 3,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 2:18 pm by Chuck Ramsay
Frank United States District Court District of Minnesota 316 North Robert Street St. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
This is because the 9th Circuit decision in Rent-a-Center revealed that the question had been passed upon by the district court. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
"Company liable for improperly accessing e-mails, but no individual liabilityPrepared by Winston & Strawn LLPA federal district court held that certain individuals who read printouts of an employee's personal e-mail that had been improperly accessed could not be held individually liable for violations of the Stored Communications Act ("SCA"), while the suit could proceed against the company, an affiliated company, and the company's president… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States) in which the Court restricted the scope of the statute on which federal prosecutors have long relied in corruption cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:45 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- Last month, in addition to Photocure ASA v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by thejaghunter
Fitzpatrick is to appear in Monroe County court on June 28, 2010. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:02 am
Manufacturer Not Liable for Seller's Alleged False Advertising of ProductsThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Taiwanese bicycle component manufacturer Tien Hsin was not directly or vicariously liable under the Lanham Act or Washington law for allegedly false advertising by a separate corporation (FSA)—whose trademark was held by the manufacturer—that sold Tien Hsin's products to North American distributors and retailers, the… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:26 am by Larry Ribstein
Last fall Guhan Subramanian, Steve Herscovici and Brian Barbetta (“SHB”) posted a paper claiming that Delaware’s antitakeover statute (Delaware GCL Section 203) was preempted by the Williams Act because it did not leave hostile bidders the “meaningful opportunity for success” required by three 1988 federal district courts which had upheld the Delaware law back in 1988. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- Last month, in Photocure ASA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am by Gene Quinn
William Marbury was appointed by President John Adams to be a justice of peace for the County of Washington in the District of Columbia. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Thomas concerned good-time credits for Federal prisoners, and Hamilton v. [read post]