Search for: "BARRETT"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 6,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
[I suspect the Court punted this Kentucky COVID case to avoid jumping the gun on Fulton.] [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 5:30 pm
Much attention in recent months has focused on the Supreme Court and its newly appointed justice, Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:12 am
“The first abortion case of the Amy Coney Barrett era is now before the Supreme Court; The Court’s new majority has its first chance to take a shot at Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:01 am
In a 7-1 decision (with Justice Amy Coney Barrett not participating because she joined the court after the case was argued), the court upheld a determination of the Pecos River Master, who was appointed by the court itself to oversee implementation of its decree issued in 1988 after previous rounds in this long-running litigation. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:09 pm
If Justice Barrett is willing to give a courtesy fourth, the Court could decide the issue this year. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Barrett, Michael Gerhardt and Kermit Roosevelt III [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:09 pm
Matthew Daly of The Associated Press reports that “Senate confirms Barrett replacement on federal appeals court. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
By the time Indiana appealed its loss at the Seventh Circuit, SCOTUS would include Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and many court-watchers wondered whether the change to the bench would result in the Court’s eroding its landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court’s newest addition, did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm
Just a few days ago, the Supreme Court (including all the conservative justices, with the exception of Amy Coney Barrett, who wasn't confirmed in time to participate) unanimously ruled against the administration in an important religious-liberties case allowing Muslim victims of discrimination by law-enforcement agencies to seek money damages. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:02 am
Justice Barrett did not participate. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 7:02 am
And Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not participate in the decision. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:30 pm
Barrett for bringing to our attention this quite arresting interview of William O. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:43 pm
Indeed, none of the three Trump appointees (including the recently appointed Amy Coney Barrett, whom Trump said he wanted to get confirmed quickly in part for the purpose of dealing with election disputes) even went so far as to agree with Alito and Thomas' view that Texas should be allowed to file its complaint (even if only to be immediately rejected). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
And, Justice Barrett did not signal her recusal. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am
The nine-page, 8-0 decision, with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the court and Justice Amy Coney Barrett not participating, reverses judgments of the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Dec. 7, 2020) Note: Then-Circuit Judge Barrett was a member of the panel when this case was submitted but did not participate in the decision and judgment. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:05 am
“Senate Judiciary Committee advances Amy Coney Barrett replacement on 7th Circuit to floor over Dem opposition; Committee reported current U.S. attorney favorably to floor on party-line vote”: Tyler Olson of Fox News has this report. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association was made 8-0, with Justice Clarence Thomas issuing a concurring opinion and Justice Amy Coney Barrett not taking part in the decision. [read post]
