Search for: "Bay v. State"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 3,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
SETTLEMENTS EPA to Allow States Address Rising Ocean Acidity. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 7:06 pm
The process of ideological genesis over the course of the year is best captured from a state of anticipation without the benefit of foresight. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State and Santa Clara County both filed their return briefs on September 9, 2011. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State and Santa Clara County both filed their return briefs on September 9, 2011. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Blake Brown Canadian State Trials, Vol. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm
On Thursday, Estonia announced that it acceeded to a US request to resettle one detainee from Guantanamo Bay, “as long as that person has not been convicted of a crime. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
- http://t.co/Mnmeo8u (Kerry Scott Boll) Google+ Posts Now Appear in Google Search Results – http://t.co/BbKqVz0 (Ben Parr) Google Buying Motorola Mobility For $12.5 Billion – http://t.co/zC3YjvA (Peter Kafka) Google Law Moves Closer after Search Giant Invests in Online Legal Documents - http://bit.ly/qTQdon (Legal Futures) Industry Tries to Streamline Privacy Policies for Mobile Users – http://t.co/YRUdork (Tanzina Vega) Inside Exchange 2010: Resource Mailboxes –… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Rabiej Leaves The Sedona Conference for Duke Law Center - bit.ly/xOirdg (Brendan McKenna) Keeping Your Outsourced Solution From Becoming A Problem - bit.ly/A61j6J (Joey Seeber, Shaun Yeh) Making The Most Of Delaware’s New eDiscovery Rules: Tips 1-5 - bit.ly/zQXx9T (Daniel Garrie) More Legal Issues about Privacy (and GPS) - bit.ly/xb9Apl (Peter Vogel) NY State Court adopts Zubulake Standard: Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation Triggers… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm
In this two-part report, it pieces together what life is like for girls who are forced into prostitution — and how law enforcement continues to criminalize girls the state legally defines as sexually exploited victims.Last month, the FBI announced the results of Operation Cross Country V, a 40-city investigation that led to the rescue of 69 children who were being victimized through prostitution. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 7:46 am
Box 110351 Birmingham, AL 35211 Phone: (205) 853-5703 (V/TTY) Fax: (205) 856-6226 Technet 275 Crockett Circle Florence, AL 35633 Phone: (256) 765-3895 DISABILITY ORGANIZATIONS AIDS Birmingham Aids Outreach, Inc P.O. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
Blocking injunctions So called “blocking injunctions” under English law have mainly been a feature of copyright law where well-resourced content owners have clubbed together to force internet service providers to the block internet access for pirate websites (See Twentieth Century Fox v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch) and [2011] EWHC 2714 (“Newzbin 2”) and Dramatico Entertainment & Others v BSkyB & Others [2012] EWHC 268 (Ch) and [2012] EWHC 1152 (Ch)… [read post]
