Search for: "CONDIT et al. v. CONDIT et al." Results 2901 - 2920 of 3,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Cullen issued his decision July 12, 2006. *** The McBurney Corp. (26-CA-17564, et al.; 352 NLRB No. 35) Norcross, GA Feb. 29, 2008. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Tom King, et al (NFP) - "Although it may have been preferable to consolidate both flooding instances into one lawsuit, each flooding occurrence creates a separate cause of action. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:58 pm
  The government on Wednesday filed a petition in Ashcroft, et al., v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:58 am
Co. et al"In this environmental cleanup insurance coverage action, special equities overcome the presumption favoring the first-filed action in New York and support proceeding in New Jersey. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:20 pm
Kaiser Cement, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The anitrust case (Pacific  Bell Telephone, et al., v. linkLine Communications, et al., 07-512) is a test of the theory that a “prize squeeze” violates the Sherman Act. [read post]