Search for: "Case & Associates Properties IncĀ " Results 2901 - 2920 of 4,958
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
I’ve previously written about the case here, with more thoughts here. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:22 pm by Kristi Tousignant
“Our members have started to receive homeowners associations and condo associations banning pit bulls outright,” said Di Matteson, secretary of B-More Dog Inc., a dog advocacy group. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 10:09 am by Gary Watt
Subject to narrow exceptions such as community property or other unity-of-interest cases, in a multi-party case, separate offers should be made to each defendant or plaintiff. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:48 am
As an intellectual property lawyer and avid sports fan, I’m always interested in a case involving the legal intersection between sports and IP. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am by Andrew Mirsky
Commercial vs. non-commercial uses: In the Sony Betamax case (Sony Corporation of America v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:08 am by Ira Meislik
In the first case, it worked out in the tenant’s favor; in the second case, in the landlord’s favor. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm by Patrick Hughes
  Thus emerged Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm by John P. Ahlers, Lindsay K. Taft
Scott, Inc.[8]  Therefore, if addressed by Washington courts, the occasional blocking of someone's view or passing over of property through the air (i.e., property that is not being used) by the crane jib will also likely not constitute a nuisance as there is no actual interference with the property. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
  The evidence showed that from 1996 through September 2000, Edwards, the founder of ETS Payphones, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:50 am by Mack Sperling
Dominion Mid-Atlantic Properties II, LLC (Jolly);  Ferguson Fibers, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:37 pm by Paul A. Prados
In all other cases, a taking or damaging of private property is not for public use if the primary use is for private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development, except for the elimination of a public nuisance existing on the property. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:01 am by Daniel Richardson
Engelberth Construction, Inc., 2012 VT 80.There are concepts within the law that are the legal equivalent of St. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 11:43 am by Charles Chevalier
Chevalier is an Associate in the Gibbons Intellectual Property Department. [read post]