Search for: "Commitment of M B" Results 2901 - 2920 of 3,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
But I also think -- if I'm not mistaken, it's in the budget -- as well as the financial results for last year. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
September 13, 2010, Volume 2, Number 26 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:56 am
(m) "Practitioner" shall mean a licensed or registered physician, dentist, podiatrist, chiropractor, nurse, midwife, physician assistant or specialist assistant, physical therapist, or optometrist. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 11:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
Again, although there is fodder in each of these, I’m going to leave it to the reader to delve into their specifics. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
(b) If the value of the money received is $300 or more, a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:50 am by Jeff Lipshaw
  I give my students two examples of middling cases:  (a) the condominium for which I turned out to have grossly overpaid because of the need to do far more renovation work to make it habitable than I expected, and (b) a "rent-to-own" contract in which a low-income person commits to pay $2,500 for a $900 sofa. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:13 pm by Michael
    Subject 1:  RACE:  B            SEX:  M          AGE:  Early 20's. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:13 pm by froomkin@law.tm
    Subject 1:  RACE:  B            SEX:  M          AGE:  Early 20's. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:21 am by Josh Wright
So, did the New HMGs make the move from cheap talk to commitment on out of market efficiencies? [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Rick Hills
The solution is not virtue but some mechanism of credible commitment: Candidates include (a) strong political parties that can force or tempt individual congresspersons to sacrifice revenue in return for the party's endorsement and campaign funds or (b) constitutional restrictions on federal spending for "local" projects. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:45 pm by NL
I'm not so sure about the Court's assumption that Mr B would be assisted as homeless by the LA, but there may well be reasons why he would be in priority need that aren't apparent from the judgment. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:45 pm by NL
I'm not so sure about the Court's assumption that Mr B would be assisted as homeless by the LA, but there may well be reasons why he would be in priority need that aren't apparent from the judgment. [read post]