Search for: "Daily v. Daily" Results 2901 - 2920 of 14,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 2:01 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 “In relation to the national police computer it was for the data controller to determine the purposes for which data was processed. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:52 am by tracey
Regina (NM) v Islington Borough Council: [2012] EWHC 414 (Admin);  [2012] WLR (D)  52 “When considering whether a duty of assessment of needs for community care services had arisen under section 47(1) of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 the interpretation of the words ‘may be in need of any such services’ covered both cases of present need and a narrow penumbra of cases of reasonably predictable future need.” WLR… [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:49 am by tracey
If the highway authority exercised that power the frontager would become entitled to compensation under section 66(8) of the 1980 Act.” WLR Daily, 7th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:25 am by sally
Berry v Star Autos Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1304; [2011] WLR (D) 327 “On a claim to which there were two or more defendants the court had power to order an interim payment under CPR r 25.7(1)(e) if it were satisfied that at least one of the defendants against whom the application for interim payment was being made would be held liable and each of those defendants was insured; the fact that there might be another defendant who was not insured was immaterial.” WLR… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:50 am
"Law School takes part in Court case; Supreme Court Litigation Clinic to represent petitioner in Abbott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:26 am by constitutional lawblogger
As the Court - - - and the country - - - consider the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the constitutionality of the preclearance provision at issue in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:05 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law A few days before he was sworn in as President of the United States, the complaint in Zervos v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:01 am by constitutional lawblogger
The energy surrounding the Court's anticipated grant of certiorari in at least one of the same-sex marriage cases - - - either one or more of the DOMA cases or the Prop 8 case (Perry v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:32 am by constitutional lawblogger
This question, or at least some version of it, is at the heart of the Supreme Court's consideration of United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:33 am
Slack and others v Cumbria County Council (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 293; [2009] WLR (D) 127 “The beginning of the period allowed for initiating an equal pay claim would not be triggered until the expiry of the stable employment between the employer and employee within the meaning of the section 2ZA [...] [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:37 am
R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust (Equality & Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 587; [2009] WLR (D) 202 “On the facts of the particular case, a registered social landlord was a hybrid public authority and the act of terminating the tenancy of its assured tenant was not a private act and was [...] [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:06 am
Roult (by his mother and litigation friend) v North West Strategic Health Authority [2009] EWCA Civ 444; [2009] WLR (D) 164 “There was no power pursuant to CPR r 3.1 in the context of personal injury litigation to vary the terms of a settlement where there had been an unforseen event which destroyed the assumption on [...] [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:32 am
Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening [2009] EWCA Civ 852; [2009] WLR (D) 280 “In a claim by a public landlord for a possession order against its demoted tenant, the jurisdiction of the county court was limited to considering whether the procedure for bringing the possession claim had [...] [read post]