Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
https://t.co/9Fjeq0Qwo5 -> I Duran Duran Loses Case, Brought In Britain, Over American Copyrights https://t.co/dCRYz0o46f -> CBS Sues YouTuber for Posting Episodes of 'The Andy Griffith Show' https://t.co/iv2mgYPiTI -> New PIPEDA Finding exposes transparency challenges in state access to personal information https://t.co/4bn7ZGsXNI -> Who Will You Nominate for the 2016 Clawbies? [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:10 pm
The officer first stated that his report did make such an allegation. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 2:41 am
That warning label, issued in both English and Spanish, stated the product was extremely flammable and should be kept away from heat/ sparks/ flame and should only be used with adequate ventilation. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:05 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Castillo v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:05 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Castillo v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Cowper-Smith v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 3:08 am
Supreme Court, in a June 2006 decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
Mongeon Bay Properties LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch) (02 December 2016) is a relatively short (45 paragraph) judgment of Mr Justice Arnold, in his own words 'not without hesitation'. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
Amusement Art, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
(Campbell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:54 am
ZTE [...].a) The Chamber [= panel] outlined its interpretation of the CJEU opinion in Huawei v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
Many state owned enterprises do not see other SOEs or even the Chinese government itself as separate competitors. [read post]
