Search for: "Fish v. State"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 3,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Wildlands v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:29 am
In Medina County Environmental Action Association v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
Silver v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
SETTLEMENTS EPA to Allow States Address Rising Ocean Acidity. [read post]
Public Entity Liability For Injuries To Bicyclists Caused By Hazards In Illinois' Recreational Areas
6 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
(b) Any hiking, riding, fishing or hunting trail. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm
A good example of willful blindness is found in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
See Franks v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
(I never agreed with that argument, and still do not -- the program as I understood it cast a very broad net but still caught no fish. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm
Harris, a former Fish & Richardon shareholder, sold his patents to Parker and others under duress while still with Fish, but won't reveal what financial relationships he maintains, if any, with the holding companies that now own those patents. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Part II consists of papers by Osofsky on Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
Contents include:Yann-huei Song, Prompt Release of Fishing Vessels: The Hoshinmaru and Tomimaru Cases (Japan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:38 am
Harlan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:48 pm
The decision in Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:41 am
The fishermen sued, claiming violations of federal maritime law and state wage laws. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
” The Justices also refused, without recorded dissent, a second request by the state of Michigan for an order to the federal government and others to take strong new measures to prevent migration of a destructive species of fish — Asian carp — into Lake Michigan. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and another [2010] EWCA Civ 263; [2010] WLR (D) “The Sea Fish Industry Authority (Levy) Regulations 1995, which empowered the Sea Fish Industry Authority to treat sea fish and sea fish products imported from a member state of the European Union as ‘landed’ in the United Kingdom for the purpose of imposing levies upon them, were ultra vires s 4 of the… [read post]