Search for: "French v. French"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 5,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 2:31 am
The slaughter of the staff of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo and the other killings by three criminal misfits produced wide ranging reflections on freedom of expression and responsibility. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
The current Rules and Regulations of the National Parks already states that “[v]isitors [which] are engaged in filming/photography intended for their personal use and enjoyment” are “generally” not required to have a permit. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:02 am
This morning, the European Court of Human Rights held a Grand Chamber hearing in the case of Lambert and Others v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:37 am
France and Hassan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:58 am
ADDED: "[V]ideo, recorded by the French journalist Martin Boudot from a nearby rooftop as shots were fired — and the attackers shouted 'Allahu Akbar'... posted... by French state television":Click for more » [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:14 am
Related StoriesReading the #SCOUTS tea leaves: Young v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 6:34 am
"fry (v.)... late 13c., from Old French frire 'to fry' (13c.), from Latin frigere 'to roast or fry,' from PIE *bher- (4) 'to cook, bake' (cognates: Sanskrit bhrjjati 'roasts,' bharjanah 'roasting;' Persian birishtan 'to roast;' Greek phrygein 'to roast, bake'). [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 3:02 am
See CSC Holdings LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:22 am
In case you missed the news, the controversial Magmatic v PMS International litigation over the scope of protection enjoyed by the designers of Trunki children's luggage is heading for the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:26 am
Looking back on the Michaelmas term, it was full of interesting cases including the appeal of Beghal v DPP heard on 12 November. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
& Associates Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Houdek v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:21 am
Justices French, Hayne, Crennan and Kiefel, in the majority's decision, saw that, on the face of the evidence given that the marks have are not merely descriptive, and Cantarelle got to keep their trademarks. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
In addition Birss J followed Arnold J’s approach in EMI v BSkyB when considering what elements should be taken into account to determine whether a certain website is targeted at a specific public, including the number of visitors. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
