Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 2901 - 2920 of 6,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmeriPride Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Circuit Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the negligence and respondeat claims, but the Appellate Court reversed. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:53 am by Patricia Salkin
Because Fitanides was not prejudiced by any procedural mistakes that occurred during the municipal proceedings, and the Planning Board did not err in interpreting and applying the Ordinance, the court affirmed the Superior Court’s holding in favor of issuing the conditional use permit. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Abbott &amp; Kindermann
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
After this Court granted leave to appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed on the ground that the City's motion had never been converted to one for summary judgment and plaintiffs, therefore, were not put on notice of their obligation to make a complete record and to come forward with any evidence that could possibly be considered. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:31 am by Patricia Salkin
The Obolenskys then appealed, principally challenging the court’s grant of injunctive relief requiring them to alter their stockade fence. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:49 am by Gregory Forman
Then, on March 18, 2015, it dismissed as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari in The Spriggs Group, P.C. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But because we conclude that the Board’s factual findings support a constitutionally valid distinction between patterns of subsistence use, and because the Board’s regulations do not otherwise violate the law, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to the State, upholding the statute and the Board regulations against the Fund’s legal challenge. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
There’s a case pending in the Suffolk County Commercial Division, Margiotta v Tantillo, Index No. 62839-2013, that exemplifies the extraordinary demands upon the court’s resources as it’s called upon repeatedly to grant various forms of interim relief to one side or the other in a hotly contested family business divorce. [read post]