Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 2901 - 2920 of 4,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 5:26 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
  The candidate is currently the elected City Attorney of the second largest City in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
., offshore websites offering copyrighted music or movies for download, or selling counterfeit Omega watches, all without authorization from the rights holders. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:40 am by Lyle Denniston
Holder, decided nearly three years ago. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:35 am by Miriam Baer
When the Solicitor General of the United States makes a representation to the Supreme Court, trustworthiness is presumed. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
Succeeding on a dilution claim against a small competitor without a meaningful market presence is made more difficult with this decision, notwithstanding the change in law designed to avoid this type of outcome, which was enacted subsequent to the United States Supreme Court's decision in the seminal Victoria's Secret case. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
Copyright attorneys for Golan and a group of musicians who had used foreign works while the works were in the public domain had filed this lawsuit against United States Attorney General Eric Holder, arguing that the Act violated the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:38 am by Marissa Miller
Topics included abortion, religion, lawyers’ salaries, and the Justice’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  The inventor-friendly principles that governed the original United States Patent Office back when Thomas Jefferson ran it (though he personally wasn’t too much a fan of patents) are still the law today, even though the scope of prior art in most industries has expanded far beyond the point where any patent examiner could reasonably review it, much less ensure an inventor in an ex parte proceeding fairly describes it. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:01 pm by mstein03
The Court stated this could have occurred if the “United States did not protect works from the country of origin at the time of publication; the United States did not protect sound recordings fixed before 1972; or the author had failed to comply with U.S. statutory formalities . . . [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm by Gordon Firemark
  Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters A Canadian Lawyer’s perspectives MegaUpload Golan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:36 pm by Record on Appeal
  The HAWSCT granted leave for United Policy Holders to file an amicus brief in support of the Harts. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:03 pm by Craig J. Cox
S. works even if those works were previously considered to be in the public domain in the United States. [read post]