Search for: "House v. State"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 25,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2009, 12:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 10:05 pm
“Historically, Native voters in northeastern North Dakota have been able to elect two State House candidates of our choice. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 1:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:07 am
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
Happy Birthday Marbury v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Burglary, defined to be the act of breaking into and entering the house of another in the nighttime with intent to commit a felony therein. 9. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:03 am
Wisconsin Realtors Association v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
Imagine you're in a state, for example, where Section 15 says that you get three years in prison if you burn a house "owned by another person" and Section 22 says that you get two years if you burn a house "owned by the defendant himself. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
The Court cites McCarthy v SoS for Home Department and Abdirahman v SoS for Work and Pensions in support, and explained (politely) a comment made by Kay LJ in Kaczmarek v SoS for Work and Pensions (at [23]) as well as R(Badar) v Ealing LBC (irrelevant as right of residence was not contested). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
The Court cites McCarthy v SoS for Home Department and Abdirahman v SoS for Work and Pensions in support, and explained (politely) a comment made by Kay LJ in Kaczmarek v SoS for Work and Pensions (at [23]) as well as R(Badar) v Ealing LBC (irrelevant as right of residence was not contested). [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 4:40 pm
In Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253, the House of Lords provided some flexibility in respect of the interpretation of the term “likely” here but the judge considered simply that he had to show that “the defendant is likely to fail to establish one of the statutory defences”. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:45 am
In Powell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
State and State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 12:57 pm
The bill is one of many state legislative initiatives aimed at curtailing reproductive rights in the aftermath of the Supreme Court decision of Dobbs v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:04 am
He also argued that Gersh did not allege a sufficient basis under state law. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
