Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 2901 - 2920 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Hoffman, 149 N.J. 564 (1997) (discussing harassment prosecution for ex-husbands unwanted mailing to his ex-wife). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Cari Rincker
  However, on appeal, the appellate court held that the wifes interest in the embryos outweighed the husbands interest in not procreating. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The story — let us all learn and profit by it — is in Hall v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:46 am by Susan Brenner
The [Supreme] Court explained that, `[n]ormally husband and wife may conveniently communicate without stenographic aid, and the privilege of holding their confidences immune from proof in court may be reasonably enjoyed and preserved without embracing within it the testimony of third persons to whom such communications have been voluntarily revealed. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Nevertheless, in October, 2010, the ex-wife commenced another action against 23 defendants, including her ex-husband, her children, her former in-laws, her ex-husbands former attorneys, and other entities. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
 The Court found that the testator’s distribution of his estate further to his Will did not reflect the very high moral obligation that society would expect of a husband towards his dependant wife of 45 years. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Aaron Weems
 The order requiring husband to pay the wife $33,600.00 was upheld, as well as the court’s rationale in determining that specific amount. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am by Cornell Library
The significance of state responsibilities for the definition and regulation of marriage dates to the Nation’s beginning; for “when the Constitution was adopted the common understanding was that the domestic relations of husband and wife and parent and child were matters reserved to the States,” Ohio ex rel. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The wife argued this was error: that when establishing the husbands gross income, Justice Maron improperly relied upon the husbands unfiled 2011 K-1 statement and the affidavit of an employee of the husbands law firm; improperly deducted alleged 2012 federal and state income taxes; and failed to include approximately $200,000 in perquisites that the husband received from his law firm. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:44 pm
I thought I would close off this week’s blogs with a recent decision that reviews the law on surrogate parents.In M.D. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:37 am by David DePaolo
This paperwork authorized Kelley’s participation in Mission’s Health and Safety Plan, offered by Mission’s parent company, Tetco Inc.The plan provides benefits for workers who are hurt on the job, including medical care, rehabilitative care, wage replacement, dismemberment and permanent impairment benefits, and death benefits.Kelley was told he had to sign the paperwork in order to secure medical benefits.According to his wife's… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:42 pm by Michael Walsh
  The Court of Appeal concluding that the insurance policy on the husbands life was the wifes separate property upon dissolution of the marriage, even though the policy was purchased during the marriage and the premiums prior to the couple’s separation were paid with community funds, because the policy listed the wife as the owner. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:31 am by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
 In one case, a husband wanted to keep the shore house and "bought out" wife's share. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court’s most famous ruling on plural unions was its 1879 decision in Reynolds v. [read post]