Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 40,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 12:39 am
On 29 July 2010, shortly before the end of the legal term, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Imerman v Tchenguiz ([2010] EWCA Civ 908). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Mont v United States, 587 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 2:34 pm
I posted some time back about Facebook v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:01 am
As most law students and corporate scholars know, Wilkes importantly qualified the same court’s case of the year before, Donahue v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:16 pm
In the Warman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
Recent decisions such as Video Software Dealers Association v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:56 pm
Kamakahi v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:02 am
In Morris v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:56 pm
Kamakahi v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:25 am
“While the facts of the SOCAN case relate to online music previews and not legal research, the legal questions at issue include the meaning of ‘research’ as a head of fair dealing and how, in the internet age, courts should balance copyright holders’ interests with user rights,” CanLII said in a statement in its official blog.The organization says its board of directors authorized this application in defence of the “large and liberal” interpretation… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 5:55 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
” Young v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
White v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:10 pm
The days of stopping someone from watching show X on a large T.V. but through and Internet device should be numbered. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:40 pm
Countryman Nevada LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:03 am
While the Sixth Circuit largely affirmed the trial court decision, the appeals court vacated a punitive damages award of $67,650 because the district court gave improper jury instructions (House v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 3:33 am
The court, in affirming the judgment of a district court in Vermont, relied largely on the plain meaning of the visual arts statute to find that the obscuring of the two murals did not equate to their unauthorized “destruction” or “modification” (Kerson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:10 am
SEC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
He is believed to have left Canada in 2014 to join ISIS in Iraq or Syria and is at large somewhere in the Middle East. [read post]
