Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 21,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2019, 1:34 pm
The defendants argued the CEO was not personally liable because he did not manage or control the company’s field operations, did not hire the workers or monitor the hours they worked, and did not set their pay structure. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:35 am
Ultimately, the court disagreed with the defendants’, holding that there was no extraneous information that actually prejudiced the verdict and denied the daycare’s request for a new trial. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:03 pm
A plaintiff must establish a ‘connecting element’ or a ‘causative link’ between the defendant’s conduct and the threatened harm. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 4:27 am
In this report, Defendant's expert offered several theories to explain that, even though Plaintiffs identified a user at Defendant's IP address as the infringer on November 18, 2003, it is possible that Defendant was not the infringing user. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:05 am
If the Court were to accept Plaintiff’s argument, then one who discriminates against a Jewish person would automatically be liable for discrimination based on race, religion, and national origin, without any regard to what the nature of the discriminatory act was. [read post]
Lackawanna Trial Court Grants Motion to Preclude Cumulative Expert Opinion Testimony in Med Mal Case
27 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
.), the court addressed a Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine seeking to limit alleged cumulative expert testimony in a medical malpractice litigation. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:13 pm
Thus, in the absence of a claim that the underlying facts stated in that email were themselves false and defamatory, the statement was purely the defendant’s subjective analysis. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:20 pm
Thus, in the absence of a claim that the underlying facts stated in that email were themselves false and defamatory, the statement was purely the defendant’s subjective analysis. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:01 am
The second reason what that a reasonable jury would not have found that defendant was not liable for injuries to the plaintiff. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
As such, the Court denied the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the matter will continue to be litigated on it’s merits. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
As such, the Court denied the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the matter will continue to be litigated on it’s merits. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
As such, the Court denied the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the matter will continue to be litigated on it’s merits. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
As such, the Court denied the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the matter will continue to be litigated on it’s merits. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
The defendant's mechanic also testified that he did some work on the truck's lights a few days prior to the truck accident and that all lights were working properly at that time. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 10:43 am
In the subject case, the defendant argued that it was not a successor of its predecessor, and therefore could not be held liable for the predecessor’s acts. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
As such, the defendant’s motion to transfer the case to Montgomery County based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens was denied.Social Host LiabilityOver the past year, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered the extent to which a host of an event at which alcohol is served may be held liable for the actions of an intoxicated guest, particularly when that intoxicated guest is an employee of the host.In the case of Klar v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:51 am
The en banc Federal Circuit thought otherwise: in its view, a defendant who performed some steps of a method patent and encouraged others to perform the rest could be liable for inducing infringement even if no one was liable for direct infringement -- and on the evidence Limelight could be held liable on an inducement theory. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
In this case, settlement damages for at least one of the defendants were paid through the family’s insurance company, reported the Orange County Register. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
What’s wrong, Lassie? [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 6:01 pm
The court explained that it was critical to appreciate that the pertinent time period of the defendants’ knowledge of the employee’s mental instability was not limited to August 4-7, 2013. [read post]
