Search for: "MATTER OF J M J" Results 2901 - 2920 of 5,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the same way, decision T 240/04 [16.3] already stated as regards new claims not sufficiently connected to the subject-matter of the one previously filed: “In einer solchen Situation den neuen Antrag zuzulassen würde einem Patentinhaber praktisch die Möglichkeit geben, nach Belieben eine Zurückverweisung an die Erstinstanz zu erzwingen. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 3:33 pm by familoo
I’m not saying it’s wrong, but my eyebrow is raised. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm by familoo
I’m going to run through a brief chronology of new sources of information first and then make a few observations. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
27% said journalists/editors, 43% someone else, 29% didn’t know; no significant differences between groups.David J. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:10 am by Lyle Denniston
But Wednesday’s hearing had proceeded for only a few minutes when Justice Anthony M. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:30 am by WSLL
Olson, Chief Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
Paragraph M prohibits the parties from slandering each other and requires the parties to turn to for any problem the parties may have. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:30 am by Christopher Robertson
To the extent that incentives matter in our world of rational actors, an economy of dependence is an economy of influence. [read post]