Search for: "Matter of Will of Church" Results 2901 - 2920 of 6,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
(For details, see this post, and this one.)Third proposition: As such, there is no single person (or body) at the "head" of the Episcopal Church (USA). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm by Elie Mystal
He’s the solicitor at Brimstone & Co. who is representing the European Raelian Movement in this matter. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:47 am by Rick Klau
Our first step was to throw out the key words that the board felt mattered most from Jeff’s book. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Michael Posluns
The 2008 apology arose out of an agreement between the Government of Canada and the churches which ran the residential schools under contract and the class action plaintiffs who were then suing the Government and the churches. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:27 am by boston
Obama was asked about the matter recently by a reporter from New Orleans. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by resistance
And the church lauds him, so I guess it must feel comfortable having him as its spokesperson.  [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by resistance
  And the church lauds him, so I guess it must feel comfortable having him as its spokesperson. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am by Maxwell Kennerly
 The picketing was conducted  under police supervision some 1,000 feet from the church, out of the sight of those at the church. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 7:25 am
"Rail security is a national priority and a matter of critical importance to the rail companies, shareholders, workers, and the general public--if rail security isn't a matter of significant social policy, then what is? [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm by Daniel Solove
Snyder involves tort claims against Fred Phelps, pastor of the Westboro Baptist Church, and others arising out of the practice of Church members to picket the funerals of U.S. soldiers. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:06 am by David Pocklington
It would be both unjust and disproportionate for me to make a restoration order in the face of that TMRO, not least given that, upon the expiry of that TMRO in March 2024, there may be a petition for faculty to set matters on a permanent lawful footing. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm by Adam Gillette
So, rather than forcing the Court to hear the case on its merits, the matter can just go by default? [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Now this sort of balancing might look fine if you really trust judges to balance such matters impartially. [read post]