Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am
The citizen’s religious freedom claim does not depend on validation by an external authority: “a secular court cannot possibly choose in matters of this kind …can the State be prescriptive as to what shall be orthodox or conventional in such matters” [para 29]. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm
In the paras. 218-220 the ECtHR gives an instructive overview of its case law applying the criteria and factors ju [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
Volkman, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:37 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Novozymes v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
Complicity is further contextualized in UNGP ¶ 19 (internalizing the prevention-mitigation principle in enterprise operations); and UNGP ¶ 22 (remediation); UNGP ¶ 23 (context);and UNCP ¶ 24 (prevent-mitigate-remedy and prioritization of addressing human rights impacts).UNGP ¶ 19 adds substantial context to the cause or contribute standard in its elaboration of the prevention and mitigation objectives of human rights due diligence… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
These days, it's all about Iqbal pleading.The case is Sanders v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:12 am
The case is captioned Cronin & Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 4:01 am
Kirk v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 7:25 am
This is a subject addressed in two recent cases.In Prince George's County v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:07 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:07 am
Doe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 12:38 pm
In Tarkowski v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 8:50 pm
Now the PCC has proposed, through its state organs, to change the Cuban constitution to reflect these changes as well. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 1:09 pm
In R. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:58 pm
While the concurring reasons in Vavilov stated at para 286 that “Curial deference is the hallmark of reasonableness review,” the majority stated at para 24 that legislatures cannot shield administrative decision-making entirely from curial scrutiny, as judicial review is protect under s. 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:01 am
In Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
(America-Israel Patent Law) Avinza (Morphine) – US: King Pharmaceuticals, Elan files patent infringement suit against Sandoz in response to Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) Cipro (Ciprofloxacin) – US: California court rules that Bayer AG et al did not violate state antitrust law in Cipro reverse payment case (FDA Law Blog) Effexor (Venlafaxine) - Israel: Patent oppositions: should substance or procedural issues win out? [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:27 pm
***The IPKat's DSM Directive SeriesDSM Directive Series #1: Do Member States have to transpose the value gap provision and does the YouTube referral matter? [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
