Search for: "People v Long" Results 2901 - 2920 of 19,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm by INFORRM
  The defence applies as long as the statement relates to a scientific or academic matter, and that it as subject to a pre-publication independent review of its scientific or academic merit by the journal’s editor and one or more people with expertise in the relevant field. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
No need to shortcut it.Even if the long way takes a decade and 42 pages. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:34 pm by Steven M. Sweat
People at the gym often took a shortcut between the treadmills instead of walking the long way around on the aisles. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 4:15 am by Bonny Rafel
An example of the use of social media to deny a claim occurred recently in Goros v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 4:15 am by Bonny Rafel
An example of the use of social media to deny a claim occurred recently in Goros v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
The fear that people would make bad decisions if given truthful information cannot justify content-based burdens on speech, the Court concluded. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For Vermeule, the common good requires a strong administrative state under modern conditions, as long as it is operating for good results, and it is difficult to contend that the SEC is not acting to [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The last Inforrm US round up was published in November 2011 – apologies for the long delay since then. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:30 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
  The only constant regardless of who you use is to look for competent people with sufficient experience. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 1:44 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
One man put her 35-page dissent in Burwell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 4:02 pm by mdkeenan
A recent Illinois appellate case, People v Bond, allowed a Blue Island police officer to arrest a defendant for DUI on the Chicago side of a Blue Island street. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 3:57 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  That would be a good occasion for the high court to reconsider the whole can of worms it has opened up since Roper v. [read post]