Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 2901 - 2920 of 44,336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Cross-posted from SCOTUS Blog, where this essay is part of its special Black History Month coverage:In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Brian Dolan
Supreme Court ruling that may pave the way for pharmaceutical companies to be liable to people who haven’t taken drugs that the pharmaceutical companies have effectively withdrawn from the market. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am by JB
The answer that people gave was that as long as limits on association were symmetrical between the races, they were constitutional.We can see this logic at work in Pace v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am by Randy Barnett
It started to get that name only in the 20th century, as far as I can determine, when that term was applied to it by some people who were opposed to an Article V convention, because they opposed the proposed amendments. [read post]