Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 39,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
[A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. [read post]
Gang Cases Update – People v. Rodriguez (California Supremes Bring Presents, Not Coal For Christmas)
8 Jan 2013, 9:47 pm
Just one month later, the Fourth Appellate District handed down the case of People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
While it may make sense to grant them an extra zone of protection vis-a-vis threats, public officials understandably have less protection when it comes to privacy and criticism. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 9:46 am
Ins. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:13 pm
People who are hardly held in high esteem. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Recently, on September 8, 2008, I commented on People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am
The same offence may be committed recklessly under s.2(1)(c). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:13 pm
For many people who may have spoken with a Michigan lawyer before July 31, 2010, and were told you had no case, the law has now changed and many people now have important legal rights restored. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:38 am
Vejdeland and others v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 4:29 am
Aldin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:49 pm
One of the many ways EFF is fighting illegal NSA spying is in our lawsuit First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:08 am
Be that as it may, she and her children had been through the care system on a number of occasions. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
People v Hunter, 2011 NY Slip Op 4542, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 12:33 am
Summary This case relates to a point of statutory construction in the Representation of the People Act 1983, s 90C(1)(a). [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Bruce Ackerman and others have suggested that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments may not have met Article V’s requirements, but attained legitimacy through other means.Similarly, it may mean that the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment can be legitimized through means other than Article V. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Two decisions -- People v Battaglia (56 NY2d 558 [1982], reversing on dissent of Hancock, Jr., J. at 82 AD2d 389) and People v Hicks (68 NY2d 234 [1986]) - - have appeared to be in conflict. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
One that Judge Kozinski doesn't explore, but that to me may be an even more likely explanation for most (but not all) oversize brief requests.The reality is that lawyers -- like many other people -- are fairly lazy. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 11:14 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:46 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
