Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 5,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
Today, given the very apparent and troubling fractures that still exist in our country along racial lines (fractures which Kennedy lamented in his powerful majority opinion in last year’s surprising civil rights victory in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
Knick v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
Thomas warned that “[w]e should not sacrifice constitutional protections for the sake of convenience. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:27 pm
Thomas R. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm
Who has the levers of power can be very important in the context of the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
” Sellers was lead counsel for the female plaintiffs in the landmark gender discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:03 am
(A good example of surprising voting coalitions that led to these fractures is Stokeling v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm
Justice Thomas wrote a fiery footnote 2. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:28 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm
Suggesting that Scalia (and Thomas) had sought to revive a discarded conception of Due Process, Stevens praised Alito and Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:45 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:23 am
NLRB v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
There remain three consistent votes in favor of state sovereign immunity: Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm
Lopez,514 U.S. at 552-553 (citing Gibbons v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Ass’n of Am., Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Only Justice Thomas, who has consistently proclaimed a pre-New Deal conception of the Commerce Clause, was likely to vote to strike the Act down on that ground. [read post]
