Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 2901 - 2920 of 4,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am by Viking
& Pol’y 443 (2012) Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-24 Abstract: The United States Supreme Court has decided several cases concerning expert testimony and the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Ken
There are many cases out there I could cite for that proposition, but I'm going to indulge in bias and cite the opinion written by the late United States District Judge Richard A. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery –… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am by Maryland Law Review
United States: Good Faith, Retroactivity, and the Loss of Principle Brandon K. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
  Richard Wilson writes about the case on the Free Speech Blog. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am by Susan Brenner
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), which I’ve discussed in prior posts.In Kyllo, federal agents who suspected Danny Lee Kyllo was growing marijuana in hishome in a triplex, . . . used a thermal-imaging device to scan the triplex to determine if the amount of heat emanating from it was consistent with the high-intensity lamps typically used for indoor marijuana growth. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:10 am by Bill
Richard Posner weighs in on Miller v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit also noted that even though the United States Supreme Court has instructed that Section 10(b) be construed “flexibly to effectuate its remedial purposes” (SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit also noted that even though the United States Supreme Court has instructed that Section 10(b) be construed “flexibly to effectuate its remedial purposes” (SEC v. [read post]