Search for: "Roes v. State"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 3,373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2010, 10:40 am
In 1984, the California Supreme Court ruled unequivocally in Hartzell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 6:14 am
Ahle v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
If you want to have an abortion but are living in a country where it's illegal, you might as well be living in pre-Roe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:50 am
Politico’s Josh Gerstein reports on United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:25 am
Adding fuel to the fire for many conservatives is the Court’s consistent endorsement of Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:30 am
" And Fiorina says she "absolutely would vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:42 am
The Eleventh Circuit just issued a very interesting recent decision on this topic in Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
And in retrospect, I wish the court had stayed its hand and allowed the political process to continue, because we would have legislated the effect of Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 10:52 pm
Commentators have referred to this case as “Europe’s Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
Sometime before commencement of the Supreme Court’s 2009 term, Mike Sacks, a third-year law student at Georgetown University, had an idea. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
ACSblog interviews Reva Siegel and Linda Greenhouse about their new book on the abortion debate before Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:31 pm
NPR (Fresh Air): The Rhetoric That Shaped The Abortion Debate: Before the Supreme Court struck down many state laws restricting abortion in the 1973 landmark case Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
ELENA KAGAN: Senator Feinstein, I do think that the continuing holding of Roe and Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:32 pm
(Notice of Denial at 19, fn.1.) [2] Draft Policy, Appendix A at 11. [3] Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
To put it mildly, there is very little consensus over the correctness, meaning, and future application of such landmark Due Process Clause decisions as Griswold, Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:05 am
I particularly admire his rejection of United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am
Politico reports that former Acting Solicitor General Walter Dellinger predicted on Tuesday in a public debate that Roe v. [read post]
