Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 2901 - 2920 of 6,090
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
However, that operation does not automatically lead to the opening of the document containing the seller’s general terms, as an extra click on a specific hyperlink for that purpose is still necessary. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:30 am by koherston
Facts: When the Mother and Father divorced, Father was ordered to pay $800 per month in child support for their two children. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 am by Pietro Franzina
In a judgment of 21 May 2015 (Case C-322/14, Jaouad El Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb) the ECJ clarified the meaning of the latter provision. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:54 am by John Jascob
By Jay Fishman, J.D.The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the Texas Court of Appeals’ decision in two consolidated cases filed against a seller of life settlement agreements, finding that the agreements met the 1946 U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:56 am
  The exceedingly long decision of the court in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 12:00 pm by Greene LLP
In opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by CVS, the relator cited Yarberry v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:34 pm
  We prefer pharmacies in the latter category – sellers of products. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm by Alan Friel
Perfect price discrimination is only theoretically possible since the seller must know each buyer’s reservation price (the maximum they will pay) and individualize an offer to them at that price, thus not leaving any potential revenues uncaptured. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am by LTA-Editor
LG Electronics, Inc. overruled the Federal Circuit’s precedent Mallinckrodt Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
  Yesterday the Alabama House of Representatives passed SB-80, which abolishes the innovator liability theory created in the execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]