Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:49 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 1:03 pm
Lomax v Gosport Borough Council (2018) EWCA Civ 1846 This was a second appeal on a homeless application by Ms L to Gosport. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
R. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Sharp J held that the article was not defamatory – it was “unremarkable” and no-one would have thought less of the claimant. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm
It is clear from [Sharp v Leeds City Council [2017] EWCA Civ 33; [2017] 4 WLR 98] and, in particular, the statement by Briggs LJ at [35], that when one speaks of the settlement of the claim for present purposes, one speaks of settlement of the claim for damages for personal injury, not settlement of the costs claimed arising upon the claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
Canada On 15 February 2023, judgment was handed down in McDonald v Goranko, 2023 BCSC 231 (CanLII). [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
On the same day, Mr Justice Vos will hear applications in the phone hacking cases of Hoppen v NGN and Miller v NGN. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
On the same day, there is an oral application for permission to appeal in the case of Wallis v Meredith (an appeal from [2011] EWHC 75 (QB)) Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
An appellate court decision issued last week in Lehey v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm
The Statement states that “Congress passed the FTC Act to push back against the judiciary’s open-ended rule of reason for analyzing Sherman Act claims” and cites the Supreme Court’s opinion in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:29 am
As patent practitioners know, how the court articulates the claims for Mayo steps 1 and 2 matters–and can even be dispositive, as the recent case of Visual Memory LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 3:14 am
In the Court of Appeal case of Sharp v Sharp, even though the marriage lasted around 6 years, it was still considered to be short enough to deviate from the 50:50 split. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
In Graham v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm
I walked by his front door on the way to class, and when I walked by — which was typically between 8:20 and 8:40, because it started at 9 sharp, I mean sharp, every day. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Both the plaintiffs and the defense attorneys sought to leverage to their advantage the fact that Cheryl Foust's twin sister, Carol, was present and in good health in a Philadelphia Common Pleas courtroom Wednesday during opening arguments in Foust v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
We let Avandia have it here.Guvenoz v. [read post]
